1. Weyn B., Tjalma W.A., Vermeylen P. et al. // Determination of tumour prognosis based on angiogenesis-related vascular patterns measured by fractal and syntactic structure analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2004. № 4. P. 307-316.
2. Dhakal H.P., Bassarova A., Naume B. et al. // Breast carcinoma vascularity: a comparison of manual microvessel count and Chalkley count. Histol Histopathol. 2009. № 8. P. 1049-1059.
3. Da Rocha A.O., Coutinho L.M., Schall J.G. // The prognostic value of angiogenesis by Chalkley counting in gallbladder carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009. № 89. P. 34-38.
4. Suhonen K.A., Anttila M.A., Sillanpaa S.M. et al. // Quantification of angiogenesis by the Chalkley method and its prognostic significance in epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2007. № 8. P. 1300-1307.
5. Hansen S., Sorensen F.B., Vach W. et al. // Microvessel density compared with the Chalkley count in a prognostic study of angiogenesis in breast cancer patients. Histopathology. 2004. № 5. P. 428-436.
6. Offersen B.V., Sorensen F.B., Yilmaz M. et al. // Chalkley estimates of angiogenesis in early breast cancer - relevance to prognosis. Acta Oncol. 2002. № 7-8. P. 695-703.
7. Hansen S., Grabau D.A., Sorensen F.B. et al. // The prognostic value of angiogenesis by Chalkley counting in a confirmatory study design on 836 breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2000. № 1. P. 139-146.
8. Doukas C.N., Maglogiannis I., Chatziioannou A. et al. // Automated angiogenesis quantification through advanced image processing techniques. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006. № 1. P. 2345-2348.
9. Hayek A., Beattie G.M., Lopez A.D. et al. // The use of digital image processing to quantitate angiogenesis induced by basic fibroblast growth factor and transplanted pancreatic islets. Microvasc Res. 1991. № 2. P. 203-209.
10. Fox S.B., Leek R.D., Weekes M.P. et al. // Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis. J Pathol. 1995. № 3. P. 275-283.
11. Sprindzuk M., Dmitruk A., Kovalev V. et al. // Computer-aided Image Processing of Angiogenic Histological. J Clin Med Res. 2009. № 5. P. 249-261.
12. Sprindzuk M., Konchits A., Shukelovich A. et al. The method for ovarian cancer recurrence prediction based on computerized lymphangiogenesis morphometry of the D2-40 stained images. International Conference on Digital Technologies 2013: IEEE. P. 52-54.
13. Sprindzuk M.V. // Angiogenesis in malignant thyroid tumors. World Journal of Oncology. 2009. № 6. P. 221-231.
14. Van der Auwera I., Cao Y., Tille J.C. et al. // First international consensus on the methodology of lymphangiogenesis quantification in solid human tumours. Br J Cancer. 2006. № 12. P. 1611-1625.
Послать статью по эл. почте 