4G/5G Wireless Systems Radiation Safety for Various Technical Equipment

An analysis of current standards for maximum permissible levels of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from 4G/5G mobile communications equipment via the enclosure port of various technical devices was conducted. It was found that for many technical devices, these requirements are comparable to or more stringent than the requirements for the general public’s exposure to these fields. Emissions from 4G/5G base and subscriber equipment are potentially hazardous to the operation of a large number of technical devices, including those used in critical infrastructure facilities. Compliance with standard requirements for susceptibility to radiofrequency electromagnetic interference via the enclosure port for most technical devices does not ensure reliable protection for their operation in the complex electromagnetic environment created by 4G/5G radio network emissions, indicating the need to revise these requirements. Calculated data on the required spatial separation between 4G/5G equipment and technical devices of various groups to ensure their electromagnetic compatibility are provided.

1. Guidelines for Evaluation of Radio Interface Technologies for IMT-Advanced. Report ITU-R M.2135-1 (12/2009).

2. IMT Vision – Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT for 2020 and Beyond. Recommendation ITU-R M.2083 (09/2015).

3. Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT for 2030 and Beyond. Recommendation ITU-R M.2160-0 (11/2023).

4. Hardell L., Carlberg M. (2020) Health Risks from Radiofrequency Radiation, Including 5G, Should Be Assessed by Experts with No Conflicts of Interest. Oncology Letters. 20 (4). DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11876.

5. Grigoriev O. A., Goshin M. E., Prokofyeva А. V., Alekseeva V. A. (2019) Features of National Policy in Approaches to Electromagnetic Field Safety of Radio Frequencies Radiation in Different Countries. Hygiene & Sanitation. 98 (11), 1184–1190 (in Russian).

6. Grigoriev O. A., Nikitina V. N., Nosov V. N., Pekin A. V., Alekseeva V. A., Dubrovskaya E. N. (2020) Electromagnetic Radiation Safety: Russian National and International Regulatory Frameworks for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. Zdorov’e Naseleniya i Sred a Obitaniya. (10), 28–33 (in Russian).

7. Mordachev V. I. (2022) Refined Analysis of the Correlation Between the Accepted Maximum Permissible Levels of Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields for the Population and the Lethality Rate of Covid-19. Doklady BGUIR. 20 (1), 55–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2022-20-1-55-64.

8. Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). ICNIRP 2020.

9. Spodobayev Yu. M. (2020) Electromagnetic Safety of Modern Wireless Technologies: ICNIRP Documents. Electrosvyas. (4), 21–24 (in Russian).

10. Mordachev V. I., Svistunou A. S., Sinkevich E. V. (2024) Electromagnetic Safety of 4G/5G Mobile Communications. Doklady BGUIR. 22 (2), 80–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2024-22-2-80-91 (in Russian).

11. Specific Sanitary and Epidemiological Requirements for the Maintenance and Operation of Facilities that Are Sources of Non-Ionizing Radiation. Approved by Resolution No 360 of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus dated June 4, 2019 (in Russian).

12. Guidelines for Evaluation of Radio Interface Technologies for IMT-2020. Report ITU-R M.2412, 2017.

13. Nokia-Airscale-5G-Radio-Description-Datasheet-5g.pdf. Available: https://1com.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Nokia-airscale-5G-radio-description-datasheet-5g.pdf.

14. Methods for Determining Levels of Electromagnetic Radiation Generated by Transmitting Radio Equipm ent Operating in the Radiofrequency Range. Instructions for Use. Approved by the Deputy Minister of Health – Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Republic of Belarus on April 29, 2013. Reg. No 006-0413 (in Russian).

15. Electromagnetic Compatibility of Technical Equipment. Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Immunity. Requirements and Test Methods. State Standard R 51317.4.3–2006.

16. Zhang Z., Xiao Y., Ma Z., Xiao M., Ding Z., Lei X., et al. (2019) 6G. Wireless Networks: Vision, Requirements, Architecture, and Key Technologies. IEEE VT Magazine. 14 (3), 28–41.

17. Deprez K., Stroobandt B., Veludo A. F., Vecsei Z., Necz P. P., Politański P., et al. (2025) 5G RF EMF Spectr al Exposure Assessment in Four European Countries. Bioelectromagnetics. 46 (6). DOI: 10.1002/bem.70019.

18. Grigoriev O. A., Zubarev Y. B. The Effects of Wireless Communication Electromagnetic Energy Influence on Persons: Predictions of the Growth for Conditioned Morbidity, Their Implementation and Problems of Evaluation. Concepcii. 1 (41), 3–17 (in Russian).

19. Schiffarth A.-M., Ta T. J., Bornkesse C., Schilling L.-M., Hein M., Heberling D. (2025) Definition and Valid ation of an Exposure Measurement Method for a Typical Load of a Base Station. Bioelectromagnetics. 46 (8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70029.

20. Najera A., Villaescusa-Tebar A., Gonzalez-Rubio J., Garcia-Pardo C. (2025) Dual Evaluation and Spatial Analysis of RF-EMF Exposure in 5G: Theoretical Extrapolations and Direct Measurements. Bioelectromagnetics. 46 (6). https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70020.