Local Correlation Metric for Assessing the Quality of Combined AFM Images
https://doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2023-21-3-78-86
Abstract
The problem of assessing the quality of combining component images formed in two synchronous channels of an atomic force microscope (AFM images), is considered. A computationally simple quality metric for combining component AFM images, based on local correlation coefficients is proposed, taking into account the contribution of each of the component AFM images to the resulting combined AFM image and the correlation between component AFM images. It is shown that local correlation provides a higher accuracy of AFM images combination quality estimation in comparison to the global correlation.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. Yu. LavetskiBelarus
Postgraduate at the Department of Infoсommunication Technologies; Junior Researcher at the Laboratory of Nanoprocesses and Technologies
Minsk
V. Yu. Tsviatkou
Belarus
Tsviatkou Viktar Yur’evich, Dr. of Sci. (Tech.), Professor, Head of the Department of Infoсommunication Technologies
220013, Minsk, P. Brovki St., 6
Tel.: +375 17 293-84-08; E-mail: vtsvet@bsuir.by
A. A. Boriskevich
Belarus
Dr. of Sci. (Tech.), Professor, Professor at the Department of Infoсommunication Technologies
Minsk
V. A. Lapitskaya
Belarus
Cand. of Sci., Researcher at the Laboratory of Nanoprocesses and Technologies
Minsk
S. A. Chizhik
Belarus
Academician, Dr. of Sci. (Tech.), Professor, Chief Researcher at the Laboratory of Nanoprocesses and Technologies
Minsk
References
1. Sun Jifeng, Jiang Yuanjiao, Zeng Shaoyong (2005) A Study of PCA Image Fusion Techniques on Remote Sensing. Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference on Space Information Technology. 5985, 739–744.
2. Zhang A. K., Dare. Y. P. (2007) Wavelet Based Image Fusion Techniques-an Introduction, Review and Comparison. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetric and Remote Sensing. 62 (4), 249–263.
3. Petrovic V., Xydeas C. (2005) Objective Image Fusion Performance Characterisation. Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’05). 2 (1), 1866–1871. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2005.175.
4. Piella G., Heijmans H. (2003) A New Quality Metric for Image Fusion. Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No 03CH37429). III–173. DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2003.1247209.
5. Qu G., Zhang D., Yan P. (2001) Medical Image Fusion by Wavelet Transform Modulus Maxima. Opt. Express. 9, 184–190.
6. Aslantas V., Bendes E. (2015) A New Image Quality Metric for Image Fusion: the Sum of the Correlations of Differences. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications. 69. 1890–1896. DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2015.09.004.
7. Han Y., Cai Y., Cao Y., Xu X. (2013) A New Image Fusion Performance Metric Based on Visual Information Fidelity. Inf. Fusion. 14 (2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2011.08.002.
Review
For citations:
Lavetski M.Yu., Tsviatkou V.Yu., Boriskevich A.A., Lapitskaya V.A., Chizhik S.A. Local Correlation Metric for Assessing the Quality of Combined AFM Images. Doklady BGUIR. 2023;21(3):78-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2023-21-3-78-86