<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bsuir</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Доклады БГУИР</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Doklady BGUIR</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1729-7648</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2708-0382</issn><publisher><publisher-name>БГУИР</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35596/1729-7648-2025-23-3-62-69</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">bsuir-4163</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сравнительный анализ показателей QoS, GoS и QoE при оценке производительности сети</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>A Comparative Analysis of QoS, GoS, and QoE Metrics in Network Performance Evaluation</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Касумов</surname><given-names>В. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gasimov</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Informationa and Computer Technologies</title></sec></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Зейналлы-Гусейнзаде</surname><given-names>Л. Р.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zeynalli-Huseynzade</surname><given-names>L. R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Lecturer at the Department of Cybersecurity and Computer Engineering</title></sec></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Захидова</surname><given-names>Г. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zahidova</surname><given-names>G. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Lecturer at the Department of Cybersecurity and Computer Engineering</title></sec></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Бакинский инженерный университет</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Baku Engineering University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>07</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>62</fpage><lpage>69</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Касумов В.А., Зейналлы-Гусейнзаде Л.Р., Захидова Г.А., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Касумов В.А., Зейналлы-Гусейнзаде Л.Р., Захидова Г.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Gasimov V.A., Zeynalli-Huseynzade L.R., Zahidova G.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://doklady.bsuir.by/jour/article/view/4163">https://doklady.bsuir.by/jour/article/view/4163</self-uri><abstract><p>Концепции QoE (качество взаимодействия), QoS (качество обслуживания) и GoS (уровень обслуживания) обычно обсуждаются в исследованиях производительности сети и удовлетворенности пользователей. Несмотря на то, что QoE стало популярной темой в исследованиях, границы между QoS и QoE часто размыты, что затрудняет их четкое определение. В статье рассмотрены различия и связи между этими терминами с учетом их практического применения. Качество обслуживания – это субъективный показатель, отражающий то, как пользователи воспринимают услугу. На него влияют личные предпочтения и различные факторы окружающей среды. GoS измеряет вероятность успешного соединения или вызова при определенных условиях. Результаты показали, что внедрение функций QoS, таких как приоритизация трафика, может положительно повлиять как на GoS, так и на QoE, уменьшая потерю пакетов и повышая надежность обслуживания. Показано, как управление производительностью сети с помощью инструментов QoS может повысить удобство работы пользователей и общую надежность услуг, обеспечивая более четкое понимание того, как эти концепции взаимодействуют на практике. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The concepts of QoE (quality of experience), QoS (quality of service), and GoS (goal of service) are commonly discussed in network performance and user satisfaction studies. Although QoE has become a popular topic in research, the boundaries between QoS and QoE are often blurred, making it difficult to clearly define them. This paper examines the differences and relationships between these terms with regard to their practical applications. QoS is a subjective metric that reflects how users perceive a service. It is influenced by personal preferences and various environmental factors. GoS measures the probability of a successful connection or call under certain conditions. The results showed that implementing QoS features such as traffic prioritization can positively affect both GoS and QoE by reducing packet loss and improving service reliability. It is shown how network performance management using QoS tools can improve user experience and overall service reliability, providing a clearer understanding of how these concepts interact in practice. </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>качество обслуживания</kwd><kwd>уровень сервиса</kwd><kwd>качество взаимодействия</kwd><kwd>показатели производительности сети</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>quality of service</kwd><kwd>grade of service</kwd><kwd>quality of experience</kwd><kwd>network performance metrics</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hayder S., Shah N., Awan A. A. (2015) Comparative Analysis of QoS, QoE, and GoS in Multimedia Networks. IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security of Smart Cities, Industrial Control System and Communications (SSIC). Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 1–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hayder S., Shah N., Awan A. A. (2015) Comparative Analysis of QoS, QoE, and GoS in Multimedia Networks. IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security of Smart Cities, Industrial Control System and Communications (SSIC). Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 1–6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rahim A., Zain A. N. M., Rahman A. F. A., Nor M. F. A. M., Salleh R. (2013) A Comparative Analysis of QoS, GoS, and QoE Metrics in Multimedia Communication. International Conference on Informatics and Creative Multimedia (ICICM). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 89–94.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rahim A., Zain A. N. M., Rahman A. F. A., Nor M. F. A. M., Salleh R. (2013) A Comparative Analysis of QoS, GoS, and QoE Metrics in Multimedia Communication. International Conference on Informatics and Creative Multimedia (ICICM). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 89–94.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hossain S., Matin M. A., Ahmed M. A. (2019) Comparative Analysis of QoS, QoE and GoS Metrics in Telecommunication Network. 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information &amp; Communication Technology (ICEEICT). Dhaka, Bangladesh. 1–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hossain S., Matin M. A., Ahmed M. A. (2019) Comparative Analysis of QoS, QoE and GoS Metrics in Telecommunication Network. 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information &amp; Communication Technology (ICEEICT). Dhaka, Bangladesh. 1–6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prajapati A. M. V., Solanki A. M., Jain S. L. B. (2019) Comparative Analysis of QoS, GoS and QoE Parameters in WiMAX Network. International Conference on Power Electronics, Smart Grid and Renewable Energy (PESGRE). Ahmedabad, India. 1–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prajapati A. M. V., Solanki A. M., Jain S. L. B. (2019) Comparative Analysis of QoS, GoS and QoE Parameters in WiMAX Network. International Conference on Power Electronics, Smart Grid and Renewable Energy (PESGRE). Ahmedabad, India. 1–6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Choi J. M., Kong S. G., Kwak K. S. (2013) Comparative Analysis of QoS and QoE Metrics in the Context of IPTV. International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN). Bangkok, Thailand. 317–322.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Choi J. M., Kong S. G., Kwak K. S. (2013) Comparative Analysis of QoS and QoE Metrics in the Context of IPTV. International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN). Bangkok, Thailand. 317–322.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Akhtar M. S., Islam M. Z., Ali A. B. M. S. (2019) Comparative Analysis of QoS, QoE and GoS in Wireless Multimedia Communication. International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE). Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. 1–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akhtar M. S., Islam M. Z., Ali A. B. M. S. (2019) Comparative Analysis of QoS, QoE and GoS in Wireless Multimedia Communication. International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE). Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. 1–6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cano M., Hernandez J. A., Alcober J., Fernández A., Soto M. (2016) A Comparative Analysis of QoS, QoE, and GoS Metrics for Multimedia Services in Wireless Networks. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 1–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cano M., Hernandez J. A., Alcober J., Fernández A., Soto M. (2016) A Comparative Analysis of QoS, QoE, and GoS Metrics for Multimedia Services in Wireless Networks. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 1–6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
